RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: While Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) has been linked to inferior clinical outcomes, studies examining the clinical outcomes and readmission of OUD patients experiencing Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) remain lacking. The authors analyze the clinical and financial outcomes of OUD in a contemporary cohort of AMI hospitalizations. METHODS: All non-elective adult (≥ 18 years) hospitalizations for AMI were tabulated from the 2016‒2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database using relevant International Classification of Disease codes. Patients were grouped into OUD and non-OUD cohorts. Bivariate and regression analyses were performed to identify the independent association of OUD with outcomes after non-elective admission for AMI, as well as subsequent readmission. RESULTS: Of an estimated 3,318,257 hospitalizations for AMI meeting study criteria, 36,057 (1.1%) had a concomitant diagnosis of OUD. While OUD was not significantly associated with mortality, OUD patients experienced superior cardiovascular outcomes compared to non-OUD. However, OUD was linked to increased odds of non-cardiovascular complications, length of stay, costs, non-home discharge, and 30-day non-elective readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OUD presented with AMI at a significantly younger age than non-OUD. While OUD appears to have a cardioprotective effect, it is associated with several markers of increased resource use, including readmission. The present findings underscore the need for a multifaceted approach to increasing social services and treatment for OUD at index hospitalization.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The recent opioid epidemic in the United States has led to rising prevalence of maternal opioid use disorder (OUD). First-line treatment for maternal OUD involves the use of opioid agonist pharmacotherapy, such as methadone or buprenorphine, in addition to cognitive behavioral therapy and counseling. The management of maternal OUD can become overwhelming for both patients and clinicians, especially during the early postpartum period. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians understand the impact of additional stressors in caring for these patients. Maternal chronic opioid dependence can lead to neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome after birth. This multisystem condition affects neonatal neurobehavioral functioning and has significant human and socioeconomic consequences. First-line treatment for this syndrome involves intensive nonpharmacologic comforting measures, with maternal presence and involvement being central to ensuring the success of such measures. In this review, we describe the factors that place pregnant and postpartum women with OUD at risk of returning to illicit opioid use. We evaluate these multifaceted personal, social, societal, and systemic factors to inform the development of future clinical care initiatives.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare prenatal exposures, hospital care processes, and hospitalization outcomes for opioid-exposed newborns before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, data were collected from 19 Massachusetts hospitals, including 5 academic and 14 community hospitals. The pre-COVID-19 cohort was defined as births occurring during March 1, 2019-February 28, 2020, and the COVID-19 cohort was defined as births occurring during March 1, 2020-December 31, 2020. Opioid-exposed newborns born at ≥35 weeks of gestation were included. Differences in prenatal substance exposures, hospital care processes, and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) outcomes, including pharmacologic treatment for NOWS (PharmTx), length of stay (LOS), and as-needed (prn) treatment failure rates, were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 663 opioid-exposed newborns in the pre-COVID-19 group and 476 in the COVID-19 group. No between-group differences were seen in prenatal substance exposures or the need for PharmTx. Compared with the pre-COVID-19 group, in the COVID-19 group there was less rooming-in after maternal discharge (53.8% vs 63.0%; P = .001) and less care in the pediatric unit setting (23.5% vs 25.3%; P = .001), longer LOS (adjusted risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), and a higher rate of breast milk receipt at discharge (aOR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.22-3.39). Within the subset of academic centers, more infants failed prn treatment in the COVID-19 group (53.8% vs 26.5%, P = .02; aOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 0.98-14.5). CONCLUSIONS: Among the hospitals in our collaborative, hospital processes for NOWS, including care setting, rooming-in, and LOS were negatively impacted in the COVID-19 group, particularly in academic medical centers.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Clinical trials have indicated that a vaccine must be immunogenic in genetically diverse human populations and that immunogenicity and protective efficacy in animal models are two key indices required for the approval of a new vaccine. Additionally, the immune response (immunogenicity) and immunoprotection are dependent on the mouse strain. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the immune response (immunogenicity) and the protective efficacy (behavioral response) in three inbred mouse strains immunized with the M6TT vaccine. Female BALB/c, C57Bl/6, and DBA/2 inbred mice were immunized with the M6-TT vaccine. A solid-phase antibody-capture ELISA was used to monitor antibody titer responses after each booster dose in vaccinated animals. The study used tail-flick testing to evaluate the antinociceptive effects induced by heroin. Additionally, heroin-induced locomotor activity and place preference were evaluated. The M6-TT vaccine was able to generate a specific antibody titer in the three inbred mouse strains evaluated. The antibodies reduced the antinociceptive effect of different doses of heroin. In addition, they decreased the heroin-induced locomotor activity and place preference. These findings suggest that the M6-TT vaccine generates a powerful immunogenic response capable of reducing the antinociceptive and reinforcing effects of heroin in different inbred mouse strains, which supports its possible future use in clinical trials in genetically diverse human populations.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Initially considered a primarily rural, White issue, opioid use and overdose rates have risen faster for Latinos (52.5%) than for White, non-Hispanics (45.8%) from 2014 to 2016. With an estimated 45% to 65% of Latino immigrant families using Mexican traditional medicine (MTM) practices before seeking Western medical services, these practices could be used as a method to increase access to care and improve outcomes. Practice Model: Although not well known, MTM is founded on a defined set of theoretical tenets that comprise a whole medical system as defined by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Whole medical systems are characterized as complete systems of theory and practice that develop independently and parallel allopathic medicine. Classifying MTM as a whole medical system to encourage further research and utilization of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) practices could help improve health outcomes for Latino patients. Specific T&CM practices that could be used in opioid treatment integration to decrease stigma and increase treatment utilization are then discussed. Conclusion: Incorporating T&CM practices will allow more effective, culturally competent and culturally sensitive health care provision for Latino immigrants in the United States to decrease stigma, improve health care outcomes, and address disparities in opioid use treatment.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

The opioid epidemic is a national emergency in the United States. To meet the needs of individuals diagnosed with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) office-based opioid treatment programs (OBOT) are quickly expanding. However, social workers roles in OBOT programs are not clearly described. This paper will emphasize three roles social workers may fulfill in OBOT programs to combat the opioid crisis.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heroin production for external markets and low rates of use in Mexico have had a long history. A recent shift toward an increase in use and related problems calls for the evaluation of treatment needs in order to draw recommendations for policies. METHODS: The objectives were to identify predictors of choice of treatment and barriers to care among persons that had been with no treatment. The study included a convenience sample of 600 face-to-face interviews of people 18 years of age and older and a rapid HIV and HCV tests in three cities on Mexico's Northern Border: Ciudad Juárez, San Luis Río Colorado and Tijuana. The choice of treatment (methadone, other pubic or private treatments with no experience with methadone maintenance and only self-help or religious care), was analyzed though a multiple logistic multimodal regression analysis. Informed consents to be interviewed and for HIC and HIV were signed by interviewers. RESULTS: The majority of persons interviewed were males (89.7%) with an average age of 40. Having emigrated to the United States and a greater length of heroin use predicted seeking methadone treatment versus public or private treatment or informal care. The most important barriers to care were lack of information and stigma. HIC, HIV and other infectious and chronic diseases including depression were often unattended. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to reform treatment policies in order to cover this w emerging and demanding problem.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

O intuito, nesta pesquisa, foi compreender o embasamento teórico presente no discurso de 17 profissionais de saúde mental que atuam em três modelos de atendimento a dependentes químicos. Os dados foram coletados por meio de questionário e classificados em três categorias de análise, segundo o arcabouço teórico-epistemológico de cada abordagem e instituição, sendo elas: o modelo biomédico (clínica), o modelo sociocultural (centro de atenção psicossocial) e o modelo psicossocial (comunidades terapêuticas). Concluiu-se que os profissionais participantes não apresentam definição específica sobre os conceitos de dependente e tratamento, relativos à dependência química, e, também, suas abordagens podem ser, por vezes, contraditórias às metodologias e ideologias das instituições analisadas.

The objective in this research was to understand the theoretical background in the discourse of 17 mental health professionals working in three care models for drug addicts. The data were collected through a questionnaire and classified in three analysis categories, according to the theoretical-epistemological framework of each approach and institution, being: the biomedical model (clinical), the sociocultural model (psychosocial care center) and the psychosocial model (therapeutic communities). It was concluded that the participating professionals do not present a specific definition regarding the addict and treatment concepts of drug addiction. Also, their approaches can sometimes be contradictory to the methods and ideologies of the institutions analyzed.

La presente búsqueda, tuvo el intuito de entender el fundamento teórico presente en el discurso de 17 profesionales de salud mental que actúan en 3 modelos de atención a los adictos de drogas psicoactivas. Los datos fueron colectados por medio de cuestionarios y clasificados en 3 categorías de análisis según el marco teórico/epistemológico de cada enfoque e institución, siendo ellas: El modelo biomédico (clínica), el modelo sociocultural (centro de atención psicosocial) y el modelo psicosocial (comunidades terapéuticas). Se concluyó que los profesionales participantes no presentan una definición específica sobre los conceptos de "adictos" y "tratamiento" de dependencia química. Se concluye incluso que, el enfoque de los profesionales pueden, a veces, ser contradictorios a las metodologías e idiologías de las instituciones analizadas.

Assuntos