Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antimalarials and macrolides: a review of off-label pharmacotherapies during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
Ferreira, Paulo Michel Pinheiro; Sousa, Rayran Walter Ramos de; Dittz, Dalton; Sousa, João Marcelo de Castro e; Torres-Leal, Francisco Leonardo; Bezerra, Daniel Pereira.
Afiliação
  • Ferreira, Paulo Michel Pinheiro; Federal University of Piauí. Department of Biophysics and Physiology. Teresina. BR
  • Sousa, Rayran Walter Ramos de; Federal University of Piauí. Department of Biophysics and Physiology. Teresina. BR
  • Dittz, Dalton; Federal University of Piauí. Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Teresina. BR
  • Sousa, João Marcelo de Castro e; Federal University of Piauí. Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Teresina. BR
  • Torres-Leal, Francisco Leonardo; Federal University of Piauí. Department of Biophysics and Physiology. Teresina. BR
  • Bezerra, Daniel Pereira; Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. Gonçalo Moniz Institute. Salvador. BR
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 59: e21067, 2023. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS | ID: biblio-1429947
Biblioteca responsável: BR40.1
Localização: BR40.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract We critically analyzed clinical trials performed with chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with or without macrolides during the first wave of COVID-19 and discussed the design and limitations of peer-reviewed studies from January to July 2020. Seventeen studies were eligible for the discussion. CQ and HCQ did not demonstrate clinical advantages that justified their inclusion in therapeutic regimens of free prescription for treatment or prophylactic purposes, as suggested by health authorities, including in Brazil, during the first wave. Around August 2020, robust data had already indicated that pharmacological effects of CQ, HCQ and macrolides as anti-SARS-CoV-2 molecules were limited to in vitro conditions and largely based on retrospective trials with low quality and weak internal validity, which made evidence superficial for decision-making. Up to that point, most randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials did not reveal beneficial effects of CQ or HCQ with or without macrolides to reduce lethality, rate of intubation, days of hospitalization, respiratory support/mechanical ventilation requirements, duration, type and number of symptoms, and death and were unsuccessful in increasing virus elimination and/or days alive in hospitalized or ambulatory patients with COVID-19. In addition, many studies have demonstrated that side effects are more common in CQ-or HCQ-treated patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Macrolídeos / Pandemias / COVID-19 / Antimaláricos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) Assunto da revista: Farmacologia / Terapˆutica / Toxicologia Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Macrolídeos / Pandemias / COVID-19 / Antimaláricos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) Assunto da revista: Farmacologia / Terapˆutica / Toxicologia Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil