Retrospective comparative study of rigid and flexible ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteral stones
Int. braz. j. urol
; 42(5): 967-972, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab
Article
em En
| LILACS
| ID: lil-796892
Biblioteca responsável:
BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background:
We analyzed the outcome and complications of rigid (R-URS) and flexible (F-URS) ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treatment of proximal ureteric stone (PUS). Subjects andmethods:
Retrospective data of 135 patients (93 males and 42 females) submitted to R-URS and F-URS for treatment of PUS in the period between July 2013 and January 2015 were investigated. (R-URS, group 1) was performed in 72 patients while 63 patients underwent (F-URS, group 2).We compared the 2 groups for success, stone characteristics, operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications.Results:
The overall stone free rate (SFRs) was 49/72 (68%) in group 1 and 57/63 (91%) patients in group 2, (P=0.005). The operative time was shorter in group 1 in comparison to group 2 with statistically significant difference (P=0.005). There was not any statistically significant difference between 2 groups in complication rate (P=0.2). Conclusıon Both R-URS and F-URS could be a feasible option for treatment of PUS. R-URS is less successful for treatment of PUS and should be used cautiously and with availability of F-URS.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
LILACS
Assunto principal:
Litotripsia
/
Cálculos Ureterais
/
Ureteroscopia
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Int. braz. j. urol
Assunto da revista:
UROLOGIA
Ano de publicação:
2016
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Egito
País de publicação:
Brasil