Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intra-abdominal Content Movement in Prone Versus Lateral Decubitus Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF).
Menezes, Cristiano M; Andrade, Luciene M; Lacerda, Gabriel C; Salomão, Marlus M; Freeborn, Mark T; Thomas, J Alex.
Afiliação
  • Menezes CM; Department of Locomotor System, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Andrade LM; Columna Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Lacerda GC; Instituto Hermes Pardini, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Salomão MM; Columna Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Freeborn MT; Columna Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Thomas JA; Evergreen Health Kirkland, Kirkland, WA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 49(6): 426-431, 2024 Mar 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173254
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

A prospective, anatomical imaging study of healthy volunteer subjects in accurate surgical positions.

OBJECTIVE:

To establish if there is a change in the position of the abdominal contents in the lateral decubitus (LD) versus prone position. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the LD position has been validated anatomically and for procedural safety, specifically in relation to visceral risks. Recently, LLIF with the patient in the prone position has been suggested as an alternative to LLIF in the LD position. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral region in the right LD position with the hips flexed and the prone position with the legs extended. Anatomical measurements were performed on axial magnetic resonance images at the L4-5 disc space.

RESULTS:

Thirty-four subjects were included. The distance from the skin to the lateral disc surface was 134.9 mm in prone compared with 118.7 mm in LD ( P <0.0001). The distance between the posterior aspect of the disc and the colon was 20.3 mm in the prone compared with 41.1 mm in LD ( P <0.0001). The colon migrated more posteriorly in relation to the anterior margin of the psoas in the prone compared with LD (21.7  vs . 5.5 mm, respectively; P <0.0001). 100% of subjects had posterior migration of the colon in the prone compared with the LD position, as measured by the distance from the quadratum lumborum to the colon (44.4  vs . 20.5 mm, respectively; P <0.001).

CONCLUSION:

There were profound changes in the position of visceral structures between the prone and LD patient positions in relation to the LLIF approach corridor. Compared with LD LLIF, the prone position results in a longer surgical corridor with a substantially smaller working window free of the colon, as evidenced by the significant and uniform posterior migration of the colon. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for increased visceral risks when performing LLIF in the prone position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II-prospective anatomical cohort study.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Disco Intervertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Disco Intervertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos