RESUMO
Introduction: Because Genomic selection (GS) is a predictive methodology, it needs to guarantee high-prediction accuracies for practical implementations. However, since many factors affect the prediction performance of this methodology, its practical implementation still needs to be improved in many breeding programs. For this reason, many strategies have been explored to improve the prediction performance of this methodology. Methods: When environmental covariates are incorporated as inputs in the genomic prediction models, this information only sometimes helps increase prediction performance. For this reason, this investigation explores the use of feature engineering on the environmental covariates to enhance the prediction performance of genomic prediction models. Results and discussion: We found that across data sets, feature engineering helps reduce prediction error regarding only the inclusion of the environmental covariates without feature engineering by 761.625% across predictors. These results are very promising regarding the potential of feature engineering to enhance prediction accuracy. However, since a significant gain in prediction accuracy was observed in only some data sets, further research is required to guarantee a robust feature engineering strategy to incorporate the environmental covariates.
RESUMO
Genomic prediction is revolutionizing plant breeding since candidate genotypes can be selected without the need to measure their trait in the field. When a reference population contains both phenotypic and genotypic information, it is trained by a statistical machine learning method that is subsequently used for making predictions of breeding or phenotypic values of candidate genotypes that were only genotyped. Nevertheless, the successful implementation of the genomic selection (GS) methodology depends on many factors. One key factor is the type of statistical machine learning method used since some are unable to capture nonlinear patterns available in the data. While kernel methods are powerful statistical machine learning algorithms that capture complex nonlinear patterns in the data, their successful implementation strongly depends on the careful tuning process of the involved hyperparameters. As such, in this paper we compare three methods of tuning (manual tuning, grid search, and Bayesian optimization) for the Gaussian kernel under a Bayesian best linear unbiased predictor model. We used six real datasets of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to compare the three strategies of tuning. We found that if we want to obtain the major benefits of using Gaussian kernels, it is very important to perform a careful tuning process. The best prediction performance was observed when the tuning process was performed with grid search and Bayesian optimization. However, we did not observe relevant differences between the grid search and Bayesian optimization approach. The observed gains in terms of prediction performance were between 2.1% and 27.8% across the six datasets under study.
Assuntos
Genômica , Melhoramento Vegetal , Teorema de Bayes , Melhoramento Vegetal/métodos , Genômica/métodos , Algoritmos , FenótipoRESUMO
Genomic selection (GS) changed the way plant breeders select genotypes. GS takes advantage of phenotypic and genotypic information to training a statistical machine learning model, which is used to predict phenotypic (or breeding) values of new lines for which only genotypic information is available. Therefore, many statistical machine learning methods have been proposed for this task. Multi-trait (MT) genomic prediction models take advantage of correlated traits to improve prediction accuracy. Therefore, some multivariate statistical machine learning methods are popular for GS. In this paper, we compare the prediction performance of three MT methods: the MT genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP), the MT partial least squares (PLS) and the multi-trait random forest (RF) methods. Benchmarking was performed with six real datasets. We found that the three investigated methods produce similar results, but under predictors with genotype (G) and environment (E), that is, E + G, the MT GBLUP achieved superior performance, whereas under predictors E + G + genotype × environment (GE) and G + GE, random forest achieved the best results. We also found that the best predictions were achieved under the predictors E + G and E + G + GE. Here, we also provide the R code for the implementation of these three statistical machine learning methods in the sparse kernel method (SKM) library, which offers not only options for single-trait prediction with various statistical machine learning methods but also some options for MT predictions that can help to capture improved complex patterns in datasets that are common in genomic selection.